> Do you want to distribute Apache Batik source code with FreeMind? I see following differences between Apache Batik and SimplyHTML
1. We do not develop Apache Batik, but do develop SimplyHTML. 2. We use some stable release of Apache Batik, but we do not have any suitable release of SimplyHTML: it is still under development. 3. Apache Batik is not being developed especially to be used in FreeMind, but SimplyHTML is maintained by me with this purpose. I consider SimplyHTML as a part of my FreeMind activities. It's no more than a side-effect of my engagement for FreeMind. After we release 0.9.0 I shall produce a corresponding release of SimplyHTML. But I do not see any sense of producing beta releases of SimplyHTML before: this program does not have such numerous users. I conclude that if publishing of Source Code is required by GPL and we do not use any release to refer to, the best solution is publishing of SimplyHTML code as a part of FreeMind packages. Best regards, Dimitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
