> I would prefer that you make the releases of SimplyHTML in its sourceforge > project. > Then, we are not requested to submit its source code as we neither do it with > jibx, for example.
Hi Chris, there are many reasons for my request. 1. I change code of SimplyHTML in order to fix some of the bugs as they are reported. But I do not produce a label or release anytime I commit such change. So the state of the code used in FreeMind is different from the SimplyHTML release I have published in the download section of SimplyHTML. It is even not easy to get the exact state which corresponds to the SimplyHTML in the FreeMind distribution. The easiest way to synchronize the SimplyHTML code with the FreeMind releases is getting it from CVS always when the release is build. It is the easiest way, if you consider that getting the source code from the CVS is an ANT task and building it is an ANT task too. This way the consistency of the code with the SimplyHTML.jar can be insured with simplicity and certainty. On the other hand it is much more difficult to produce a Release of SimplyHTML anytime something is changed there. 2. SimplyHTML is an integrate part of FreeMind. So I think that it is better in the sense of GPL if its code is included. Best regards, Dimitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
