Dan Polansky wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Dan, for reference, there were recently articles that distros derivating > their work from Debian were asked by the FSF to provide the source code > even though they didn't do any changes to the packages created by > Debian. Reason was that Debian might die and the source code wouldn't be > available anymore. Our situation is *possibly* comparable. > > > Do you have links to these articles? SimplyHTML cannot disappear as long > as it is on SourceForge. And if SourceForge would disappear, so would > FreeMind. So this is most probably practically irrelevant argument. http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS4218186268.html http://software.newsforge.com/software/06/06/23/1728205.shtml And I do agree that it's practically irrelevant, but legally it might not be.
> > If indeed GNU GPL would require us to include in our CVS all the source > code of all the libraries that we use, we would have in the extreme to > include the source code of JavaRE in our CVS ;). No, because we don't distribute the JavaRE binaries. But, as said, let's go on, we'll see if someone knocks on our door. Eric > > Regards, > Dan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
