Hi Dan, > Dimitry has asked me whether I agree that there would be a responsible > person. The idea of a person /responsible/ is his, not mine. I have only > confirmed that I have no problem with this idea. No one should use the > term "reponsible person" and violate its meaning at the same time. > > It is not me who insists that there should be a person responsible. > > You have to clarify this with Dimitry. > > I have not proposed anything; I have only agreed to certain proposals. > > If someone uses the words "responsible person" and "to delegate", he > should better know what he is speaking of. These were not mine words; > these were the words of Dimitry.
Speaking about the responsible person I mean somebody who is (1) allowed and (2) willing to do or coordinate the job. Because bug tracker is relevant for all, it assumes that there is an agreement between the person and the rest of the team about it. So if I am allowed to take care of the bug tracker (as I have proposed), my best option is to find good people who could do it or help me with it. Dimitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
