Maybe we could have a "pending reject" kind of status, that would let
originators know that without more information, we have to close their
bugs. If, after 2 weeks, there is no new information, we close them.
Ray
Dimitry Polivaev wrote:
I'd be more blunt in my approach: if, after a reasonable amount of effort,
we can't reproduce it, we just close it. I did it recently for one of the
bugs, putting it pending to give the user a chance to react (OK, it was
also so that he/she provided next to no information).
The only remaining question are about who could spend his time in
evaluating the requests and whether he is allowed to close the requests
that seems to be wrong (or set them to pending status so that the
originator can response).
FYI: I have done an experience that some of the bugs can be demonstrated
only with some J2SE versions.
Dimitry
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Freemind-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Freemind-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
