Hi,

under these circumstances, I do not want to take over the task, and I
suggest that we postpone this discussion post 0.9.0.

I'm astonished that someone might even think about creating a hierarchy
for an Open Source project with more or less 5 active members!

Eric

Dan Polansky said:
> Hi Dimitry,
>
> I have to correct your reading of what I have agreed to.
>
> I have agreed that I have no problem making *you* the responsible person,
> coordinating the effort. I did not mention that I would agree that *anyone
> else* is going to be responsible. I have agreed that you could delegate
> the
> task to Eric and Ray as you see fit, to the extent to which they agree. I
> did not agree that you delegate the task to anyone outside the current
> FreeMind team.
>
> If you delegate the task, you are still going to be reponsible. If
> something
> goes wrong, it is going to be your responsibility that it went wrong.
> Delegation does not mean passing away responsibility.
>
> If there was some further misunderstanding, I propose we have another talk
> on this topic.
>
> Regards,
> Dan

-- 
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Freemind-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer

Reply via email to