Eric, > > 2. Another point: is it correct that programs with the proposed > extension > > are not allowed to link with parts without such extension? I am afraid > > SimplyHTML and the latex plug-in have still unextended GPL V2+ . What > > about them? > I argue that it's not an issue because the new license would allow anybody > to take the whole code and release it under "pure" GPLv2 or 3+ (the latex > lib is GPLv3, AFAIR).
I think that nobody is allowed to distribute software where SimplyHTML and some not GPL compatible open source software run in the same process. Do you think it is not at least a formal problem? Dimitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
