Ramon van Handel wrote:
>
> >The difference is that in early development you use a device number in
> >the "LOCAL/EXPERIMENTAL" range, rather than having a permanently
> >assigned number. Clashes with other experimental projects is fairly
> >likely. Might as well chose an unused one automatically until plex86
> >gets its own allocated number, IMO.
>
> Hm. IS our device number in the experimental range ? I didn't pick it, so
> I wouldn't know ;)
>
> As plex86 is, IMO, past the "experimental stage" (well, it's still in an
> early stage but it's getting usable fast), perhaps we should apply for a
> real major.
Yes, I think we should apply for a real one. Anyone
want to take up this task?
-Kevin
