>Yes, excactly... I could imagine 1 physical computer with a huge amount of >memory, running ie 20 virtual machines. Thinking of ASP, this would be a >cool thing, because of much less footprint, and easier administration >(rebooting a machine, is just killing a process i the underlying system). But this doesn't mean *nesting* the virtual machines... you can run as many VMs next to each other as you want. We were talking about nesting them, which doesn't sound very practical in this case. >Btw. Will it be possible to use plex86, whithout running X? It already is. There is a curses interface. -- Ramon
- How many VM-levels is possible? Morten Lund
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Ulrich Weigand
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Kevin P. Lawton
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Julian Hall
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Jeffrey B. Siegal
- RE: How many VM-levels is possible? Morten Lund
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Jeffrey B. Siegal
- RE: How many VM-levels is possible? Kevin P. Lawton
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Jeffrey B. Siegal
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Ramon van Handel
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Jeffrey B. Siegal
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Ramon van Handel
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Fred Weigel
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Drew Northup
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Jeffrey B. Siegal
- Re: How many VM-levels is possible? Drew Northup
