Drew Northup wrote:
> I do believe what Kevin and others were really getting
> at was making the VM backgroundable & recoverable at
> the same time........... this would allow many VNC
> like attributes, but it would not require the same
> kind of resource overhead that VNC does.
The resource overhead of VNC is probably less than you may believe (and
can also be made more efficient, if necessary). I suspect it is less
than the overhead of virtualization for most applications.
Anyway, what I do think makes sense from this point of view of
virtualization that goes beyond the capabilities of VNC is some kind of
save-to-disk facility so you can "put away" a VM and resume/reconnect
later.
