> I think his point is that the main advantage of having multiple nodes > residing behind a shield node, compared to just using the shield node > itself, is that there's more disk space on the total set of nodes. Well, I think that your view of this is slightly coloured by the clustering proposal. I don't see this as one shield node with a load of nodes behind it, but where nodes randomly select a shield node whenever they attach their address to a DataSource. Of course, nodes want to avoid selecting a node controlled by Darth Vader or whoever but they can either rely on the fact that probabilistically it is unlikely that a random node will, or they can confirm node authenticity through out-of-band means. Ian.
- [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issues Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymit... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymit... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymit... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anon... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node ... tavin
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node ... Matthew Toseland
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node ... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node ... Mr . Bad