On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 06:28:59PM -0800, Mr.Bad wrote: > >>>>> "IC" == Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: <> > Oskar, correct me if my interpretive dance is off at all. Close enough. > Also, I think Oskar and Scott need to have a powwow about > features. Scott seems to be totally opposed to 3 lines of unnecessary > code, while Oskar doesn't mind throwing in the kitchen sink, as > long as it's not used. B-) I don't think this is true (in either case, and I realize you are using hyperbole). Any specific example? -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issues Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issu... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the ... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... tavin
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Matthew Toseland
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Steven Hazel
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issues Brandon