On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 09:46:19AM -0800, Mr.Bad wrote:
> >>>>> "OS" == Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> OS> What I wanted from the branches was a 0.3 tree and 0.4
> OS> tree. This belongs in the the 0.3 tree.
>
> Oskar, you obnoxious twat! Don't tell me what you want from branches!
> YOU didn't want branches AT ALL, and you put big stipulations on how
> hard it was going to be, how you didn't think they were necessary, and
> how someone would have to manage the stable branch.
I wanted to have a 0.3 and 0.4 branch. Only I wanted to simply create them
in different modules rather than use cvs branches - or rather I stipulated
that it might be just as well.
> Now, I've been thinking about this, and I guess you could see changing
> the behavior of the node when it gets a ref collision as a bug
> fix.
The problem is that this is not just a matter of bugfixes. It may well be
that we want to implement completely new features to the 0.3 branch that
are not going to be in 0.4 (or at least not in the same way).
> Ian, did you test this at all? Like actually run it and make sure it
> worked?
>
> ~Mr. Bad
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /\____/\ Mr. Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> \ / Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/ | *Stay*Real*Bad*
> | (X \x)
> ( ((**) "If it's not bad, don't do it.
> \ <vvv> If it's not crazy, don't say it." - Ben Franklin
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
--
'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?'
'Here,' Montag touched his head.
'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded.
Oskar Sandberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
