On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:12:38AM -0500, Zack W Kneisley wrote: > I've been watching this list for some time now, and it seems that > Freeradius is much more robust than I previously thought. Could some > users of this list give me some configuration examples (users served, > how many NAS's using, Hardware & OS's being used, using sql, how long > you have been using it ect. ) I have been looking into several different > radius packages and it seems Freeradius can do almost everything the > others can. If you could provide me with successful read-world > deployments, the pros & cons, I encourage you to post them.
Two radius servers, running on Linux 2.4; 18 NASen, serving ISDN, DSL, and dialup, including roaming dialup access (wireless to be added to the list eventually) for roughly 5,000 access customers; SQL logging of accounting records, Kerberos authentication, flat users file with defaults pointed at the Unix user db. As for how long we've been using it, I imagine the list archive has a better memory of that than I do. :) Before Freeradius, we used Cistron radius. Cons of using Freeradius: I suspect we're the only people using Kerberos authentication with the current code. Pros of using Freeradius: it's the only Radius server I know of that supports Kerberos authentication. :) Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
msg10465/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
