Damjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I must say the documentation for freeradius is a bit of a mess...
As always, patches are welcome. Now that the Wiki exists, it's even easier to submit docs. > and looking at the source of rlm_files.c, check_pairs is config_items. > It's a bit confusing to use different words for the same thing. So submit patches. This isn't a commerical product where people get paid money to do copy editing, so you have to expect some level of problems. And I'll be honest, people who complain about free software really *do* have the choice of paying for commercial software, with fancy copy-edited documentation. No one here is getting paid to listen to complaints about how crappy the product is. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
