Thomas Dagonnier wrote: > Would you agree to close that part of the discussion ?
Fine. > sorry, this was a late email and I forgot important details like had in > mind "with additionnal (NAC) features" and the "for windows" is implied > by the vast majority of windows-based computers. wpa_supplicant works on Windows. It's already been accepted into nearly all Linux & BSD distributions, too. > so indeed, the most likely candidates are SecureW2 and open1x/opensea > xsupplicant, but none of them are there yet. Notice how the OpenSEA announcement included a quote from me, and mentioning FreeRADIUS? > so there's no plan, but a properly formatted, cleaned version would find > its place ? As always, patches are welcome. > Would you be open to implement Microsoft's IF-TNCCS-SOH in that context ? If someone sends a patch, yes. I'm too busy to do the work myself. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
