On 11/07/07, Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Dagonnier wrote: > > Would you agree to close that part of the discussion ? > > Fine. > > > sorry, this was a late email and I forgot important details like had in > > mind "with additionnal (NAC) features" and the "for windows" is implied > > by the vast majority of windows-based computers. > > wpa_supplicant works on Windows. It's already been accepted into > nearly all Linux & BSD distributions, too.
and it implemented TNC end of last month (oops, that was already 2 months ago). and I guess opensea will come in 1 month (according to their timeframe). I was just saying that 802.1x TNC (or NAC) capable supplicant were more important than applets - IMHO > Notice how the OpenSEA announcement included a quote from me, and mentioning > FreeRADIUS? yes, I noticed - but are you taking an active role there or just supporting by helping with freeradius (as a reference, std-based radius server) ? > > so there's no plan, but a properly formatted, cleaned version would find > > its place ? > > As always, patches are welcome. > > > Would you be open to implement Microsoft's IF-TNCCS-SOH in that context ? > > If someone sends a patch, yes. I'm too busy to do the work myself. Ok. I guess it may have something to do with that 2.0 thing (not web 2.0 - hopefully). thanks for answering, thomas - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
