Padam J Singh wrote: >>From the RFC 2866: Yes, I have read the RFC's. They're even in the FreeRADIUS source tree. They'are referenced from http://freeradius.org/rfc/, which was built by me.
> The RFC doesn't categorically say that an accounting response packet SHOULD > NOT have attributes. Read the REST of the RFC. Specifically, the Table of Attributes. > The NAS is an application I have written - so I will be able to parse > attributes in an accounting response. Your application is wrong. If it needs to have attributes sent back in an Accounting-Response packet, then it's not doing RADIUS properly. > If the standard postgres module cannot be used to send back attributes in an > accounting-response packet, > can I do the same using any other module like JRadius? I have gone through > the rlm_jradius source code, > and it looks like it doesn't differentiate between accounting and > authorization responses when reading value pairs. If you can get something to work, good luck. But the server is NOT intended to send attributes back in the Accounting-Response. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
