On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:08, Gerry Reno <gr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 09:56 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> I have some friends that are from GNU and it does matter if the code
>> has been changed using a previous code as reference. It is a difficult
>> stuff to be discussed in jury but it can happen.
>>
>> The only safe way to avoid this is to reconstruct the code without
>> this previous version as base. It doesn't seems as a valid option for
>> FreeRDP case since we have based the code on a fork from RDesktop
>> (like it or not) and thus most of basis (not the new code) is
>> derivated work.
>>
>> It seems that the only way to solve this is Cendio and their people
>> allowing us to change license. Start from scratch seems stupid for me.
>>
>>
>
> Absolutely not true.

The point is that you need to PROVE that your code is not based on the
previous code from the author A who did not accept to change the
license terms of his code.

I hope am I wrong but I think you're sub-estimating the possible
implications of it. Cendio can say our code is derivated from their
code and we need to PROVE it is not. Not the opposite.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Freerdp-devel mailing list
Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel

Reply via email to