On 06/21/2011 10:15 AM, Adilson Oliveira wrote: > Em 21-06-2011 11:08, Gerry Reno escreveu: > > >> Many of these have had to excise some portions of code for authors >> who did not want their contribution in the commercial offering. >> >> And once you have excised that code and have a clean codebase you can >> make any further modifications you wish to the new clean codebase and >> they would be under the new license. >> >> >> > Yes but this to be valid can only happen with a "clean room" > implementation thuis requiring people who never touched the original > code. Who here can claim that? I think that's the whole problem with it. > > []s > > Adilson. > >
The original author of the codebase is one of the authors who has agreed to the new license. All other works were based on this work. As such in this particular instance it does not matter so much that people have touched the original codebase. Because the original author has agreed to the new license change. Regards, Gerry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Freerdp-devel mailing list Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
