Hi Erica, I'm not sure what you mean. Why not just run it through all the way? And we would *strongly* recommend using the 5.1 longitudinal instead of 5.0
cheers Bruce On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Erica Griffith wrote: > Alright, thanks. Would you recommend against using the new longitudinal > stream with data generated from a previous version though? That is my main > question. > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > wrote: > no, there are other differences as well. > > Bruce > > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Erica Griffith wrote: > > Hi all, > > Does anyone have experience running a longitudinal > analysis in version 5.0, > using .mgz files generated from the last version of > freesurfer? My > understanding is that the only major differences between > the previous and > current versions were in the longitudinal stream. Any > input would be > appreciated! Thanks. > > > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom > it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you > in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender > and properly > dispose of the e-mail. > > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
