This is the right way to do it, but it may be over kill. I doubt the 
fMRI results are going to change much whether you use the anatomical 
from first day only, the 2nd day only, or a combination of the two.


On 02/10/2016 01:25 PM, Martin Reuter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you should co register your structural scans with robust-register or 
> robust-template (if you have more than 2). This can be done into the 
> midspace to make sure both time points are mapped to avoid processing 
> bias.
>
> You can then register the functional scans to their corresponding 
> structurals and concat the transforms to get everything into the same 
> midspace.
>
> Best, Martin
>
>
> On 02/10/2016 12:48 PM, Ji Won Bang wrote:
>> Dear. Freesurfer team.
>>
>> Thanks so much your help and advice.
>>
>> Based on the comments, I'm trying freesurfer version 5.3.0 instead of 
>> 4.5.0 now.
>>
>> In our experiment, each participant is scanned twice on different 
>> days and the functional scan's brain volume are different (some scans 
>> have 33 number of slices, some have 32 number of slices).
>>
>> Since participants moved a bit between scans on the same day, and the 
>> head position is different between different days, my advisor advised 
>> me to do co-registration between different functional scans and then 
>> do co-registration between anatomical and functional scans.
>>
>> My question is this.
>>
>> If I do motion-correction such that we align all EPI data to the 
>> first EPI of the first functional scan, will it be enough for 
>> co-registration between different functional scans and different 
>> days? Or should I do coregistration-specific process such as 
>> mri_robust_register, mri_robust_template etc?
>>
>> Or I guess the method I choose should depend on how much the 
>> participant moved between scans and how much different the head 
>> position was between different days? For example, if the participant 
>> was very still between runs and the head position was not that too 
>> different, this motion correction is enough for coregistration 
>> between functional scans. However, if not, I should do 
>> coregistration-specific process such as mri_robust_register, 
>> mri_robust_template etc?
>>
>> I'd appreciate any of your advice.
>>
>> Please feel free to let me know your thoughts.
>>
>> Best,
>> Ji Won
>>
>> 2016-02-08 22:31 GMT-05:00 Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>> <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>:
>>
>>     In 4.5 I don't think there is a way to run it when different runs
>>     have different number of slices. Version 5+ will handle it
>>     properly. If you really want to use 4.5, then you'll have to put
>>     it in a different functional subdir (FSD, eg, bold), and create a
>>     new analysis for it, then combine them together after analysis. A
>>     bit of a hassle.
>>
>>
>>     On 2/8/16 5:58 PM, Ji Won Bang wrote:
>>>     Dear. Freesurfer team.
>>>
>>>     As another attempt, I run the motion correction without the
>>>     argument -targrun:
>>>
>>>     mc-sess -s $SUBJECT -df sessdirfile -fsd bold_retino
>>>
>>>     However, I get the same error message again.
>>>
>>>     Why is that?
>>>
>>>     Thanks so much for your effort and time.
>>>
>>>     I appreciate it a lot.
>>>
>>>     Best,
>>>     Ji Won
>>>
>>>
>>>     2016-02-08 17:16 GMT-05:00 Ji Won Bang <kirsten...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>         Dear. Freesurfer team.
>>>
>>>         I'd appreciate any advice from you.
>>>
>>>         When doing the motion correction, I'd like to align all EPI
>>>         data(bold_retino) to the first EPI of target
>>>         run(bold_decode/003). However, the number of slices for
>>>         target run(33) and the number of slices(32) for input
>>>         run(bold_retino) are different.
>>>
>>>         When I type: mc-sess -s $SUBJECT -df sessdirfile -fsd
>>>         bold_retino -targrun $DATA_DIR/$SUBJECT/bold_decode/003
>>>
>>>         Freesurfer says that:
>>>         ** FATAL ERROR: perhaps you could make your datasets match?
>>>         ERROR: 3dvolreg
>>>         Invalid null command.
>>>
>>>         These two kinds of run (bold_decode, bold_retino) were
>>>         collected in one scan per subject, so the head position
>>>         should not be too different...
>>>
>>>         Do you have any suggestions for fixing this error?
>>>
>>>         Should I do 3dWarp -deoblique?
>>>
>>>         Thank you so much.
>>>
>>>         Best,
>>>         Ji Won
>>>
>>>         2016-02-08 16:30 GMT-05:00 Ji Won Bang <kirsten...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>             Dear. Freesurfer team.
>>>
>>>             Hi.
>>>
>>>             I'm using freesurfer 4.5 version.
>>>
>>>             While doing the motion correction, an error occurred.
>>>
>>>             the command I used:
>>>             mc-sess -s $SUBJECT -df sessdirfile -fsd bold_retino
>>>             -targrun $DATA_DIR/$SUBJECT/bold_decode/003
>>>
>>>             the error I have:
>>>             /home/jbang/Projects/replay/epi/replay01/bold_retino
>>>             3dvolreg -verbose -dfile 025/fmc.mcdat -base
>>>             025/tmp.mc-afni2.32291/tempvol.nii.gz -prefix
>>>             025/tmp.mc-afni2.32291/outvol.nii.gz
>>>             025/tmp.mc-afni2.32291/invol.nii.gz
>>>             ++ 3dvolreg: AFNI version=AFNI_2008_07_18_1710 (Feb 10
>>>             2009) [64-bit]
>>>             ++ Authored by: RW Cox
>>>             *+ WARNING:   If you are performing spatial
>>>             transformations on an oblique dset,
>>>               such as 025/tmp.mc-afni2.32291/tempvol.nii.gz,
>>>               or viewing/combining it with volumes of differing
>>>             obliquity,
>>>               you should consider running:
>>>                  3dWarp -deoblique
>>>               on this and  other oblique datasets in the same session.
>>>              See 3dWarp -help for details.
>>>             ++ Oblique dataset:025/tmp.mc-afni2.32291/tempvol.nii.gz
>>>             is 3.263868 degrees from plumb.
>>>             ++ Reading in base dataset
>>>             025/tmp.mc-afni2.32291/tempvol.nii.gz
>>>             ++ Oblique dataset:025/tmp.mc-afni2.32291/invol.nii.gz
>>>             is 4.564286 degrees from plumb.
>>>             ++ centers of base and input datasets are 9.09 mm apart
>>>             ** Input ./invol.nii.gz+orig.HEAD and base
>>>             ./tempvol.nii.gz+orig.HEAD don't have same dimensions!
>>>                Input: nx=74  ny=74  nz=32
>>>                Base:  nx=74  ny=74  nz=33
>>>             ** FATAL ERROR: perhaps you could make your datasets match?
>>>             ERROR: 3dvolreg
>>>             Invalid null command.
>>>
>>>             I think it's because the volume size is different.
>>>
>>>             The volume size for bold_retino is: number of slices 32
>>>             The volume size for bold_decode: number of slices 33
>>>
>>>             What should I do to correct this error?
>>>
>>>             Thank you for taking your time.
>>>
>>>             Best,
>>>             Ji Won
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Freesurfer mailing list
>>>     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Freesurfer mailing list
>>     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>     The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
>>     whom it is
>>     addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
>>     and the e-mail
>>     contains patient information, please contact the Partners
>>     Compliance HelpLine at
>>     http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
>>     to you in error
>>     but does not contain patient information, please contact the
>>     sender and properly
>>     dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
> -- 
> Martin Reuter, PhD
> Assistant Professor of Radiology, Harvard Medical School
> Assistant Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School
> A.A.Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
> Massachusetts General Hospital
> Research Affiliate, CSAIL, MIT
> Phone: +1-617-724-5652
> Web  :http://reuter.mit.edu  
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to