Agreed. A validated protocol run on a very large group of subjects in 5.3 was 
attempted with similar data in 6.0 and not only was the longitudinal edit 
stream nearly non-functional for white matter edits, cross edit performance was 
disappointing.

I am currently waiting on a response to these potential issues before pursuing 
further work with 6.0.

Best,

David P. Semanek, HCISPP
Research Technician, Posner Lab
Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Columbia University Medical Center
New York State Psychiatric Institute
1051 Riverside Drive, Pardes Bldg. Rm. 2424
New York, NY 10032
PH: (646) 774-5885

IMPORTANT NOTICE:  This e-mail is meant only for the use of the intended 
recipient.  It may contain confidential information which is legally privileged 
or otherwise protected by law.  If you received this e-mail in error or from 
someone who was not authorized to send it to you, you are strictly prohibited 
from reviewing, using, disseminating, distributing or copying the e-mail.  
PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND DELETE THIS 
MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM.  Thank you for your cooperation.

From: Antonin Skoch <a...@ikem.cz>
Date: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 5:23 PM
To: <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Worse determination of ?h.white with v6.0 in comparison 
to v5.3 - worse GM/WM contrast

Dear experts,

I am sending just one more example to illustrate issue with white surface 
estimation in v6.0. See the attached screenshots: In v6.0 there seems to be 
insufficient contrast in brain.finalsurfs.mgz, so the white surface is leaking 
at three spots dramatically outwards towards pial surface. The white surface in 
v5.3 looks much more anatomically relevant in the same spot.

Could you please comment on how to avoid such issues in v.6.0?

Regards,

Antonin Skoch


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to