good catch - not really worried but it's always better be the first to dig into
this stuff
--- On Sun, 27/11/11, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxw...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxw...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] US export controls exemption
To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Sunday, 27 November, 2011, 12:30 PM
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:10 PM, acutler22 <acutle...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> A commentor to David's blog made an interesting discovery, that Codec2 falls
> under the jurisdiction of US export controls now because it's under the 2400
> bit/s bitrate.
It's also probably worth noting that the lowest rate for speex is
2.15kbit/sec— this rate is mostly intended for coding background noise
in VBR but it does give intelligible speech. I haven't heard of
anyone having problems with it wrt export restrictions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
