With Anthonys kind help I discovered that voice codecs beneath 2400
bit/s are also on a list of controlled exports for Australia.  I have
contacted the government agency involved and they have said it will
probably OK but have advised me to submit a form to get an official OK.
This will take a few weeks so I will delay the 1400 bit/s release until
then.

In the meantime I am exploring some new paths to reduce the bit rate (a
15ms rather than 10ms internal frame rate) and the phase model, which is
the greatest source of distortion.

- David

On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 21:00 -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Don't forget the Open Source exemption (OK, they call it "public domain" 
> but we know what it means) won when KA9Q sued the U.S. government.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to