On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Gullik Webjörn <gullik.webj...@corevalue.se> wrote: > Since this is a spec, why not? I think the basic idea of a sampling rate > of 48000 is good, but why not allow 96000 and 192000 as well, allowing > extension of the spec? After al, hw is available. 48000 should of course > be the "basic standard", since that is supported by all hw.
Because those rates are multiples of 48000 they're naturally compatible too— though if you think they'd have any value at all, especially for codec2 then may I suggest some background reading: http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
