Hello David I will make an experimental RX-float-implementation (should be a simple thing, AFAI think) and send you the results.
Greetings Alfred On 19.10.2014 01:53, David Rowe wrote: > Hello Alfred, > > Yes I think it's a good idea to add a floating point sample tx and rx > functions to the freedv api. In particular for the demodulator input > samples. There are some details issues, for example the modem sample tx > level still needs to be defined to have a known drive level for the > transmit chain. > > On the SM1000 is was useful to use shorts as it saved some stack. So I > am inclined to have both the float and short interfaces, rather than > standardising on just one. > > I am also unsure of how deeply to implement the changes, for example > should there be a float interface to Codec 2 as well? > > I don't have time to work on this at the moment but am happy to accept > patches (diff -rUN) if you, or anyone else would like to work on this. > > Cheers, > > David > > On 19/10/14 00:19, wully wrote: >> Hi David >> >> So, in my TRX, I will use floating point, but when I implement my own >> floating point entry in freeDV, it is not standard. >> I suggest, that one should add a floating point demodulation entry, but >> as standard, not just in my private code... >> What do you think? >> >> Cheers >> >> Alfred, hb9epu >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
