You will have corrected the URL yourselves:

https://github.com/f4grx/hn70ap

Sebastien


Le 09/03/2018 à 09:59, Sebastien F4GRX a écrit :
>
> Friends,
>
>
> I am doing this RIGHT NOW:
>
> https://github.cm/f4grx/hn70ap
>
> The board prototype WORKS with a RTOS, NuttX. The Ethernet link works, the
> radio chip initializes OK via SPI.
>
> All we need is to continue this project. This will give us
>
> - an embedded base station for a digital voice network.
>
> - a 1 Mbps hamnet node
>
> - anything else that can use ethernet and UHF: Domotics, cubesats, etc.
>
>
> The board has a secondary si4463 with separate TX and RX line, for use with a
> decent PA and LNA outside of ISM.
>
>
> Raspberry pi hostspot guys will be able to join the fun later.
>
> Next step is reverse engineering some silabs python code to get a fully
> configurable si4463 driver instead of relying on canned configurations
> generated by a proprietary tool. We can do this because silabs refuses to give
> code, for the sake of interoperability.
>
>
> Next project will be to extend something like this to add a stm32 and a UHF
> radio module:
>
> https://dooba.io/en/articles/59
>
>
> We will then have working freedv hardware, FULLY OPEN SOURCE from first bit to
> last atom.
>
> Then the networking guys will have no more excuse.
>
>
> WE ARE EXPERIMENTERS.
>
> Needing operators is a BAD excuse. This leads too many people to LEAVE
> experimentation and focus on operating bad commercial hardware.
>
> We can be the operators of our own experiments.
>
>
> Forget experimentation, and ham radio is globally doomed. The death movement
> already started, btw.
>
> Let's revive it, every day.
>
>
> Sebastien
>
>
> Le 09/03/2018 à 09:05, Danilo Beuche a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Leon,
>>
>> if you design with a STM32F4xx and 100 pin, I would recommend to choose one
>> of the newer types (read STM32F469/STM32F479). They have a pinout compatible
>> to the 100 pin STM32F7xx line (and it is only slightly different compared to
>> the STM32F40x so a relayout shouldn't be hard). With this it would be trivial
>> to drop in a much higher performance STM32F7xx without PCB redesign. The F7xx
>> gives about twice as much performance as the F4xx with about the same amount
>> of power used (that is  our experience with the signal processing in the
>> UHSDR/mcHF vs. UHSDR/OVI40 firmware builds). This restriction does apply for
>> 100pin  devices only. So if you used a 144 pin variant of the STM32F405,
>> nothing to worry about.
>>
>> BTW, once the STM32H7 is really readily available, you get either even more
>> processing power at 400 Mhz clock for about the same power usage or at the
>> same clock rate similar performance but less power consumption due to
>> shrinked MCU design (90 -> 40nm AFAIR).
>>
>> Danilo
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09.03.2018 07:00, Leon Lessing wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Just bear with me here,
>>> My experience with some of the brandmeister guys has been less than
>>> spectacular. There is no reason we cannot use "dmr framing" and use codec2
>>> to transmit stuff, effectively splitting a dmr channel into 4 potential
>>> codec2 slots.
>>>
>>> I have revamped the adf7021 hotspot thing so it is more rf friendly, the
>>> design is unfortunately in eagle 7.7, mail me for a copy.
>>>
>>> This week I have been on holiday and struggling with the lora issue, but in
>>> the back of my mind I have been thinking mmdvm, hotspot hardware adf7021,
>>> sm1000 and 1296. I am about 90% finished with a mmdvm/sm1000/sdcard hybrid
>>> using a stm32f405.
>>>
>>> The code from mmdvm_hs uses bit banging to talk to the adf7021, I will add
>>> an adf7021 to the mix and maybe a rda1846, a gps and esp8266. Another idea
>>> is to break out the extra control lines and spi bus from the stm32f405 to a
>>> connector so we can build a stacked system. I'll publish the pcbs, I have no
>>> idea how we can use git or svn to share the pcb work.
>>>
>>> There is issues with the adf7021 and harmonics, this is why the commercial
>>> market uses R5000 (dedicated dmr framing) and the CML data pump devices.
>>> Dual band matching seems to be an issue with this device as well, I am
>>> trying to get the hotspot hardware to work on 145Mhz without harmonics on
>>> 290Mhz.
>>>
>>> Please mail me if you need a copy of the files for a peer design review, I
>>> will use dirtypcbs to do the dev run and give you guys the links and you can
>>> order pcbs, shipping from South Africa is terribly expensive.
>>>
>>> Look at the pine64 as an alternative to raspberries. The idea of doing a sdr
>>> radio is excellent, but mixer bleed through is a massive issue for the
>>> transmitting side. (most mixers gives 60db local suppression, but 60db down
>>> on +5dbm local inject is still a very strong signal)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Leon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Leon Lessing
>>> 雷立安
>>> ZS6LMG/AC9GU
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Adrian Musceac <kanto...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:kanto...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi Alan,
>>>
>>>     >
>>>     > I ask, how far are we in being able to completely replace the firmware
>>>     > in the lowly MD-380 and clone radios? Or, could we beef up the power 
>>> in
>>>     > the 7021, already used in the project!!!!!!
>>>     >
>>>     That (as in running Codec2 2400A) will never happen for technical 
>>> reasons.
>>>
>>>     Using an SDR it's possible to have Codec2, C4FM, D-Star, DMR and
>>>     whatever else on a single device.
>>>
>>>     There exist handheld full SDR terminals with a price point of
>>>     $800-$1000, capable of running almost everything you want up to high
>>>     speed video. Documentation is close to zero, writing software for them
>>>     would cost in the high 6 digits figures (not going to happen soon).
>>>     Said terminals will go EOL in 4-5 years as public services transition
>>>     to LTE.
>>>
>>>     If you want to try some of the new digital modes without spending a
>>>     fortune in equipment and DSP training, I suggest to invest some time
>>>     in learning GNU radio. It's the only viable alternative. I managed to
>>>     make for myself 4 types of Codec2 VHF modems using it. BPSK, QPSK,
>>>     2FSK and 4FSK. Enough to play with for a while. OP25 (a GNU radio
>>>     project) has had P25, C4FM, D-Star and DMR for a while now. Combining
>>>     them into a single, easy to use application is just a matter of time.
>>>
>>>     Cheers,
>>>     Adrian
>>>
>>>     
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Freetel-codec2 mailing list
>>>     Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>     <mailto:Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>>>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
>>> Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
>> Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to