Tomas I believe you are correct.  Perhaps, Bruce Parens will be able clear
this all up when he has the time to respond to this licensing issue.

Mel, K0PFX


-----Original Message-----
From: Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se> 
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 7:23 AM
To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] BSD style license for Codec 2

tor 2021-03-25 klockan 07:08 +1030 skrev David Rowe:
> Hello List,
> 
> Codec 2 is currently licensed under LGPL 2.1.  From time to time I 
> have been contacted by people who wish to use it in applications that 
> include, other closed software.  While this mix is technically 
> possible with the LGPL - it's onerous and not very practical.

Switching licenses is more onerous as you have to get permission from every
contributor to do so.

/Tomas



_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2



_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to