I applaud that it is in the Fedora package list, but will note I haven't used
my Fedora machine for almost a year...Sent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message --------From: david <da...@rowetel.com> Date: 8/10/23
1:56 PM (GMT-07:00) To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re:
[Freetel-codec2] Change to static codec2 for internal builds of
FreeDV? Hi Richard,> I just went through a painful update and dependency
rebuild in Fedora> Rawhide for codec 1.2 and I don't really want to go through
that> again 2 more times for Fedora 37 and 38.Could you please explain where
the pain points were?Another question I've been pondering - do you have any
evidence thatanyone is actually using the Fedora FreeDV packages?The reason I
ask is that for some reason we get a lot traffic/requestsfrom package
maintainers ... which translates to a lot of effort. Butthe on-air usage
numbers of FreeDV are quite low and we know most ofthem are Windows users. A
proportion of Linux uses (Fedora orotherwise) will likely build from source in
order to obtain the latest.So I am wondering if the package maintainers
outnumber users of theFreeDV packages they maintain. I'd like to do a sanity
check - makesure the effort involved is actually helping end users and the
FreeDVproject.Thanks,David_______________________________________________Freetel-codec2
mailing
listFreetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
