On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Tom Kacvinsky <tkacv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am guessing your hesitance is more based on the principle of the > matter, not the additional work it would take (since I am going to do it). > You are right. I also hated the frontend of the symbol versions which requires GCC assembler trickery. https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SymbolVersioning This is a can of warms, which I do not want to open. I have started this when I saw that libtool wraps the flat file of symbols to export into an anonymous version script. That seemed weird. Right now I would actually prefere __attribute__((__visibility__("default"))) to any list, as gcc and Vincent suggest https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/Exported-Symbols-of-Shared-Libraries.html http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/freetype-devel/2018-01/msg00067.html
_______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
