I am somewhat concerned that "cocoa" and "swift" are somewhat too specific (to
the technology) and also somewhat too general (those two words have more common
meanings in the non-tech world). Just throwing in some more ideas here.
Apple at some point called their current GUI system 'quartz' (hence the name
"Xquartz", an X server running on top of quartz). And it used to be NextStep,
and still shares some common infrastructures with GNUStep; and gnustep have
some partial supports for xcode-like project files (the xcode equivalent of
MS/VS sln/proj). And GNUStep has some obj-c support, if not written in obj-c
itself.
Maybe a folder called "Steps", "NSteps" or some sort of "...step" etc, if the
new work can be built against GNUstep on Linux?
On Tuesday 25 June 2024 at 20:36:11 BST, Sean McBride
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 23 Jun 2024, at 23:44, suzuki toshiya wrote:
> If we are working with Darwin kernel plus open source components provided by
> Apple, using "darwin" name might be a considerable option, because there had
> been the projects like OpenDarwin, PureDarwin, etc. But we are not
I agree, Darwin is not the right name here.
> - we are working with Swift (or Objective-C) and Cocoa.
Probably Cocoa or SwiftUI would be good names, depending on that "or". What
language / framework is actually be used here?
Sean
