John Molohan wrote: > A Mennucc wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> A Mennucc ha scritto: >> >>> Moreover the way these two events are mapped to my remote and to the >>> keyboard is a bit messy IMHO. >>> >> let me be more explicit... >> the confusion (for me) arises from the fact that >> the key 'enter' is mapped to the event SELECT >> the key 'e' is mapped to the event ENTER >> > I think some of the confusion here might be on the word chosen for 'e' - > ENTER, I think it could be replaced by a function called INFO. 'e' > nearly always brings up the sub menu and only actually selects or enters > an item if there's no sub menu options. The fact that it does select > items too along with 'enter' for SELECT is just confusing. I guess it's > just a hangover from some original design choices but it now just > complicates matters and it makes working through the gui less intuitive. > If I had a vote I'd say get rid of ENTER altogether and create an INFO > event, I guess it could be named EXTRA maybe if you wanted a more > generic word but either is better than ENTER.
Sensible as I map this event to the i/morE (i/mEnu) key on the remote. Now the 'i' is mapped to PIP_MOVE (this event is not used) and them 'm' is mapped to VOL+. Could map the 'i' to the ENTER event but this would cause confusion too. Duncan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
