Duncan Webb wrote: > John Molohan wrote: > >> A Mennucc wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> A Mennucc ha scritto: >>> >>> >>>> Moreover the way these two events are mapped to my remote and to the >>>> keyboard is a bit messy IMHO. >>>> >>>> >>> let me be more explicit... >>> the confusion (for me) arises from the fact that >>> the key 'enter' is mapped to the event SELECT >>> the key 'e' is mapped to the event ENTER >>> >>> >> I think some of the confusion here might be on the word chosen for 'e' - >> ENTER, I think it could be replaced by a function called INFO. 'e' >> nearly always brings up the sub menu and only actually selects or enters >> an item if there's no sub menu options. The fact that it does select >> items too along with 'enter' for SELECT is just confusing. I guess it's >> just a hangover from some original design choices but it now just >> complicates matters and it makes working through the gui less intuitive. >> If I had a vote I'd say get rid of ENTER altogether and create an INFO >> event, I guess it could be named EXTRA maybe if you wanted a more >> generic word but either is better than ENTER. >> > > Sensible as I map this event to the i/morE (i/mEnu) key on the remote. > Now the 'i' is mapped to PIP_MOVE (this event is not used) and them 'm' > is mapped to VOL+. > > Could map the 'i' to the ENTER event but this would cause confusion too. > > Duncan In this case I'd say bite the bullet and change the mapping to 'i' and rename the event, an email to the users and devel list would catch most of those who update through svn and I can put a note on the site for the next release to notify others. All the PIP mappings could probably be removed too if they have no function, similarly with the F1-F4 mappings.
John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
