Whoops I mean I sent 2 x pings of 32 bytes each 2 x 32 = 64.
----
Ben Kennish
email | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Kennish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: ipchains
> No I mean both input and output figures go up by 120.
>
> ----
> Ben Kennish
> email | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Garner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 10:49 AM
> Subject: Re: ipchains
>
>
> > From: "Ben Kennish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > OK so this may be sort of off-topic ish but ....
> > >
> > > I was reading through the mail list archive about how to monitor
> bandwidth
> > > usage on a per VS basis. The 'ipchains' method described in response
to
> > Zen
> > > Woo's question seems to work OK but the access figures in bytes seem
to
> > > increase much more than you would expect (e.g doing 2 simple pings to
> the
> > VS
> > > of 64 bytes each (from Win 2000) brings the input and output figures
up
> by
> > > 120 bytes!)
> > >
> > > Is this normal?
> > >
> >
> >
> > Well, 64 x 2 = 128 ;)
> >
>
