Whoops I meant that I sent 2 x pings of 32 bytes each 2 x 32 = 64.
----
Ben Kennish
email | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ben Kennish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 10:59 AM
> Subject: Re: ipchains
>
>
> > No I mean both input and output figures go up by 120.
> >
> > ----
> > Ben Kennish
> > email | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Simon Garner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 10:49 AM
> > Subject: Re: ipchains
> >
> >
> > > From: "Ben Kennish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > > OK so this may be sort of off-topic ish but ....
> > > >
> > > > I was reading through the mail list archive about how to monitor
> > bandwidth
> > > > usage on a per VS basis. The 'ipchains' method described in
response
> to
> > > Zen
> > > > Woo's question seems to work OK but the access figures in bytes seem
> to
> > > > increase much more than you would expect (e.g doing 2 simple pings
to
> > the
> > > VS
> > > > of 64 bytes each (from Win 2000) brings the input and output figures
> up
> > by
> > > > 120 bytes!)
> > > >
> > > > Is this normal?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, 64 x 2 = 128 ;)
> > >
> >
>
