Dear,
2001-08-17 10:41:00 ��
>Excellent stuff. I look forward to seeing the patches. In answer to your
>questions:
>
>> 1. Does it ok to assign user to group root?
>If you mean running a process within a VS as a user with group root, this
>would be OK as long as the process did not open up any root exploits. For
>instance, would there be a configuration file that admin could access which
>could manipulate the behaviour of the process in such a way as to provide
>the admin with root priviliges or affect hosting server/other virtual server
>configuration.
>
What I mean is VS admin can create user with group root. Are this will let user with
group root to have access to those file own by root and group root with permision set
to 770? Is it better to restrict VS admin to create user with group root?
below are some of my question and suggestion for FreeVSD.
Why user without email rights can also send mail and received mail? are this an error
for FreeVSD? can I just use pamvsd to control this? how?
Are quota already support in RH7+Kernel2.4, which I know it is already a patch for it,
but setting quota for user in VS(setquota) working already?
and here is my suggestion to freevsd mailling list, why not freevsd create few
mailling list(ex. freevsd-bind or freevsd-software, freevsd-(os)) so user can discuss
software bind and diffirent os outsite support list, i guess this will be better since
support list having too busy right now.
thanks you.
stenny
------------------------- The freeVSD Support List --------------------------
Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=subscribe%20freevsd-support
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe%20freevsd-support
Archives: http://freevsd.org/support/mail-archives/freevsd-support
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
