On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:41:35AM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Hi, > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 at 0:08 +0200, Dirk Nehring wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:50:10PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > [...] > > > I hope we'll get the vendor zone assigned soon, so we can change > > > the default for if no other ntp server is specified. > > > > to be really consequent, we should drop ntpclient at all, since openntpd > > is our default ntp client. If we are looking forwarding to webif2, we > > cannot support all packages with similar function at all. > > I don't get it. Webif2 is another package and has nothing to do with > ntpclient. Openntpd is not our default client, it is a ntp client > and server, which we use in our package collections as default.
??? Last week we decide to go with openntpd in the package collections, so it looks like the default client. I personally have no preferences, but there should be one suggested way to go (I have no problem to keep alternative packages, if many people like it). webif2 has much to do with the package selection since this tool will generate a config for it. > That does not mean everybody use it. I do not use it on my custom > images. Why? > > See here: > /usr/sbin/ntpd -rwxr-xr-x 1 wbx aurisp 54404 2006-10-11 01:37 > /usr/sbin/ntpclient -rwxr-xr-x 1 wbx aurisp 22896 2006-10-11 01:37 As I said last week (btw., compression helps a little bit). Dirk _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
