On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:00:17PM +0200, Lothar Gesslein wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 00:52 +0200, Dirk Nehring wrote: > > if the additional feature makes _really_ sense for us, do it. But > > please, consider the current situation: we have all development and user > > information in one place (namely: trac), which is really a great help > > for all of us. I really like the timeline feature! All information in > > one place, including wiki and source changes! > > The handbook is not in trac. This makes the vast majority of > documentation beeing not in trac. =P
The handbook was in trac before, until the team decided not to maintain 2 dokus in parallel. So, wbx copied everythin to the handbook and deleted dopple information from trac. A system to generate a doc directly out of a wiki would be more useful in my eyes, never seen such a system. The layout quality of the handbook can also be optimized. But: a handbook is professional. For every new information a developer has to decide if you have to put it on the website or into the handbook. Does this fit into you concept? Dirk _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
