Ralph Passgang dixit: >> Furthermore we have a nice OpenWrt release, which everyone can use, if >> somebody needs Broadcom Routers with 2.6! > >Waldemar, is that really you writing this? :)
I think both sides just have drunk too much… >I think the majority of developers are focusing >on 1.1 already... Since when am I the majority? oO >I think you are doing a great job with freewrt so far and at >least none of the active freewrt developers would be able to keep this work … especially kicking the other developers' arses… >up at this high level. >or do you just want a democratic authorisation for this (and maybe other >upcoming) decisions in the freewrt project? I vote against that, he should keep the authoritarian authorisation… so we can blame him if things go wrong. >if you really want an 100% open opensource project, then maybe a constitution >would be a good think. maybe project leader elections like debian does... If you're starting to think in that direction, please fill in form A38 with 2 copies, paper-mail AND fax them… you know? Let's just shut up and hack. Elections? *laugh* FreeWRT happens because it's needed by users and developers, people and companies. Never touch a running system. bye, //mirabile -- I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them. If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny existence. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
