Steve Smith wrote:I noted that I thought the 2500-5000 gallons/pound sounded exaggerated,2500-5000 gallons of water? Much of which fell from the sky onto the grazing pastures and/or field crops that the cows ate perhaps? I'm not believing that raising cattle on feed lots is a sane way to feed ourselves, but that doesn't mean these numbers can be taken at face value. This is not 2500-5000 1 gallon jugs from the grocery, nor from the same tap that you or I drink and wash from.Or get subsidized to overcome their losses. A few Web stats, no big effort made to make these all fit together.Sorry to switch subjects, but from Steve Boyan:Why doesn't a pound of beef cost more than 2500 gallons of water? and isn't referenced, but the subsidies information for livestock is more exact, while Mike Oliker's info on water price differences between agricultural/livestock usage and metro human use caps it off. In short, we subsidize cattle in a number of ways, from public lands to cheap water to corn and grain subsidies for cheap feed. |
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
