Isn't this close to Miles Parker's latest work? His WedTech talk
seemed to suggest that. His proposal was accepted, and he's got a
project page:
http://www.eclipse.org/amp/
.. he may have become less ambitious in the rule-driven approach, not
sure.
-- Owen
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:58 PM, Stephen Guerin wrote:
Russ,
I haven't seen a system like your describing. It shouldn't be too
hard to assemble though if the rule grammar was simple.
-S
--- -. . ..-. .. ... .... - .-- --- ..-. .. ... ....
[email protected]
(m) 505.577.5828 (o) 505.995.0206
redfish.com _ sfcomplex.org _ simtable.com _ lava3d.com
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:13 PM, Russ Abbott wrote:
Hi,
I'm interesting in developing a model that uses rule-driven agents.
I would like the agent rules to be condition-action rules, i.e.,
similar to the sorts of rules one finds in forward chaining
blackboard systems. In addition, I would like both the agents and
the rules themselves to be first class objects. In other words, the
rules should be able:
• to refer to agents,
• to create and destroy agents,
• to create new rules for newly created agents,
• to disable rules for existing agents, and
• to modify existing rules for existing agents.
Does anyone know of a system like that?
-- Russ============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
