Kim, 

I stand corrected on the first and agree on the second.  

N

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, 
Clark University ([email protected])
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/




----- Original Message ----- 
From: Kim Sorvig 
To: [email protected]
Sent: 9/7/2009 3:39:29 PM 
Subject: [FRIAM] mystery and emergence


Nick and all --
I would have to say that many mysterious phenomena are not emergent.

It takes one missing piece of information in an otherwise linear deductive 
process to create "a mystery."  The cat jumps into the window and knocks over a 
kachina that strands there, while I am away.  At least for a while, it is a 
mystery how that happened.  It is even more likely to be mysterious if the 
cat's behavior is atypical, or if I don't see a path for it to get from the 
floor to the window.

Secondly, there are mysteries that I doubt we will ever be able to reduce, with 
certainty, either to a linear explanation or to one involving emergence.  
Esamples "What preceded the Big Bang?" or a religious version thereof;   "What 
is outside the Universe and how can it have a boundary?";  or  "Where did 
quarks get the ruleset under which it can be shown that they operate?"    There 
are a small number of baseline existential questions in which mystery is both 
inherent and irreducible.  I know that assertion will get some of the true 
Rationalists going, and I am not looking for a big fight.  Such questions are 
very few in number, but I believe there are a half-dozen or so that we are 
obliged to 'fudge' (that is, give operational definitions to them) in order to 
proceed with rational analysis of the remaining 99.99% of inquiry.

Thus, from either a simple or sublime perspective, there can be mystery without 
emergence.

Last but perhaps not least -- and a reason for not making mystery an essential 
part of a definition of emergence -- mystery is an experiential quality more 
than an "objective" phenomenon.  We can retain the sense of wonder and of 
mystery even after we have analytically understood how some phenomenon happens. 
 Mystery is a willingness to remain astonished, and as such is not discrete 
enough to define other terms.

My two-cents worth -- which are bound to mystify some folks!
Kim Sorvig
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to