More than snippets, Carl.  WAY more than snippets.  Nick 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Carl Tollander
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 12:35 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Expertise, etcetera

 

Maybe   The Art you take    is equal to   the Art    you make.

I've always had a bias for the performance arts, in that appreciation there
comes to mean making a piece developed possibly somewhere else your own by
performing it; making it manifest in your own unique context.   Sterling
might say: Art catalyzing your history, to wake you up.

Renata floated a fine proposal today along these lines in which we would
read snippets of the great litrichar list and try to write a couple of pages
in the style, given our understanding of the original author's perspective.
Of course we confront similar issues in taiko, where 'respecting' the IP and
lineage of a piece does not necessarily need to mean leaving it be.
There's a sort of 'collaborative ownership' which is continuously being
refined, a kind of jazz.

As to more (hmmm) tangible artifacts, I have held micaceous clay pots,
simple and complex at the same time, first attempts, sitting there on the
floor behind the driver's seat of a Taurus, still warm, that simply stopped
the mind and the day.   They radiated that sincerity, that 'loyalty to one's
moment'  that comes in part from finding a way to make remote techniques
from the ancient gallery one's own.   A community thing (I knew the artist),
more an offering of a restorative path to that community (had we but the
wit), less a timeless statement to some idea of  'human nature'.

So the art here is something you participate in, show up for; it's a
conversation, concourse; necessarily complex and fluid (there's that zen
topology thing again).   Good art, maybe great art is *accessible* to those
just downstream of the original in just that way.   Maybe that's why so many
of us are science fiction fans - through the science the fiction is
accessible in a way much of the other canons are not - yet.

Pamela, I doubt that the commandants you describe were experiencing this
complexity (most of us are grateful to make a glimpse).   Perhaps more
cargo-cult banal -- 'He consoles himself that he is cultured because he can
summon the works of Bach and Goethe from the vasty deep'.  So can I, and so
can any one (given inclination and time), but does the commandant show up
for them?   Big whup, he's got a Gramophone (or its 21st century
equivalent).  How do you define appreciation?  Does one converse with a
specific work or an art form to cultivate ones self into manifesting a
better person or because the form or the artifact is a Linji challenge and
you just have to?

Carl + ale

"I was sitting in a chair in the patent office at Berne, when suddenly a
thought occurred to me, if a person falls freely, he would not feel his own
weight"  - Einstein.

On 10/14/10 8:44 PM, Robert J. Cordingley wrote: 

 May be Art is a personality amplifier.  If you have a great personality Art
makes it better.  If you are as wicked as sin, through Art you will become
more so.  A little like computers are productivity amplifiers (but I don't
know who said this first).  If you are a time waster... "there's an app for
that!" 

I've always thought that Art was never the picture on the wall, the
sculpture in the garden or the performance on the stage.  It was the
personal experience you have when exposed to the Art phenomenon, what ever
it is.  This makes the debate about what is good or bad art irrelevant
because it becomes personal and not societal.  This seems to fit with the
personality amplifier idea too. 

Thanks 
Robert C 

On 10/14/10 9:19 AM, Pamela McCorduck wrote: 



1. Anyone who thinks that art of any kind makes you a better person had
better explain why concentration camp commandants could listen to Bach at
night--with great appreciation. (And, for all I know, read Goethe and
Schiller). Furthermore, surely museum guards, exposed to art daily, must be
among our better persons, right? Evidence? 

No, literary art is the same: it is its own best excuse. To see how an
author spins a tale, presents a character, reveals a landscape, or how a
poet stops us short with a line that upends our thoughts, all these using
only the medium of words, the stuff in our mouths every day, is simply to be
made more sensitive to the act of observing. Good enough, as far as I'm
concerned. If it also helps you to understand human nature a little better,
in its contradictions and inexplicable impulses, so much the better. 

</snipped> 


============================================================ 
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv 
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College 
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to