Russell, 

Oh, well!  I couldn't' agree more:  the reviewers who were recruited to read
MY stuff were alsoall idiots and brigands. 

A stand standard review package consisted of

"REVIEWER A:  This is the worst piece of outdated trash I have read in the
last ten years.  Where has this author been for the last fifty years.
Living under some rock?  

REVIEWER B:  This the worst piece of weird off-wall-trash I have read in the
last ten years.  Where has this author been for the last fifty years.
Living on Mars? 

EDITOR:  Despite the reviewers' negative opinions of your piece, I still
would like to see a revision.  Please try to accommodate BOTH reviewers
views in your resubmission. " 

It's just the reviewers of OTHER people's papers that were deep, thoughtful,
and helpful. 

Nick, 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Russell Standish
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 4:49 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Peer review

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:27:19PM -0800, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
> And when I see review comments to papers I'm a co-author on, they 
> usually contain constructive feedback.  I do often have to sift 
> through prejudiced tangents or twist my mind to see their point of 
> view in order to get to the good stuff.  But it's almost always 
> obvious that the reviewer takes her professional responsibility 
> seriously.  Perhaps I'm just lucky in the scientists I know and the 
> reviews I've gotten of my work.  But as my dad always said: "I'd 
> rather be lucky than good." ;-)
> 

Maybe lucky, or maybe your work is more mainstream (you mention coauthor -
most of my publications are single author, and that possibly makes a
difference), or maybe its a pro-US bias (which does exist, according to
sumfink I read in New Scientist).

I should also mention - that even though I'm saying constructive revewing is
a minority in my experience, it is not a rarity either, and the pearls of
wisdom from the reviewers do make it worthwhile.

Still, nothing can be proven by mere anecdote :).

-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Mathematics                              
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         [email protected]
Australia                                http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives,
unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to