The author of the original paper speaks to criticisms:

http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/12/author-of-controversial-arsenic-.html?rss=1

<http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/12/author-of-controversial-arsenic-.html?rss=1>Science
is making the paper freely available for the next two weeks so anyone who
wants to chime in doesn't need to buy a copy:

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2010/12/01/science.1197258.abstract

-- rec --


On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Stephen Guerin
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Russ, you had a small typo in your Shrödinger quote.
>
> Instead of extracting "energy", Schrödinger actually defined living systems
> as extracting "negative entropy" from the environment:
> "the only way a living system stays alive, away from maximum entropy or
> death is to be continually drawing from its environment negative entropy.
> ..Thus the devise by which an organism maintains itself stationary at a
> fairly high level of orderliness (= fairly low level of entropy) really
> consists in continually sucking orderliness from its environment."
>
> You can download the original at
> http://whatislife.stanford.edu/LoCo_files/What-is-Life.pdf. In the notes
> area he says negative entropy is equivalent to free energy but didn't want
> to confuse non physicists.
>
> You can see this quote and a nice discussion on by Eric Schneider and James
> Kay in "What Is Life: The Next 50 Years" http://bit.ly/dO7mCE
>
> Feeding on free energy is very similar to Kauffman defining living systems
> as autonomous agents that extract work from their environment.
>
> BTW, Boltzmann also said a related bit:
> "The general struggle for existence of animate beings is therefore not a
> struggle for raw materials - these, for organisms, are air, water and soil,
> all abundantly available - nor for energy which exists in plenty in any body
> in the form of heat (albeit unfortunately not transformable), but a struggle
> for entropy, which becomes available through the transition of energy from
> the hot sun to the cold earth."
> You can read this chapter at http://bit.ly/hYsuUd
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Russ Abbott <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I his 1944 "What is Life," Schrödinger identifies a fundamental
> characteristic of living beings as being able to retain a relatively lower
> level of entropy by extracting energy from the environment. Since
> As compounds are so much less stable than P compounds the strategy that the
> As bacterium uses to maintain its low entropy level
> will probably constitute the most important aspect of this recent discovery.
> I wonder if these bacteria use relatively more energy to survive than
> comparable P bacteria or if they discovered a technique to maintain their
> structure that is not as dependent on stable As/P compounds.
> >
> > -- Russ
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to