Bruce, 

Suddenly can't think what the evidence would be for "most mutations are
lethal."  Given the tremendous capacity of the developmental system to
absorb variation and produce a common result,  how would we know.  The best
we could know is that most visible mutations are lethal.  

This is a brain fart, isn't it.  Oh Dear. 

Nick 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Bruce Sherwood
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 8:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [FRIAM] What evolves?

I'll take a stab at Russ's question, "What's the analogous force (or other
explanation) for void filling in evolution?"

Dawkins presents what seemed to me a helpful way of seeing why mutations are
usually lethal. He invents a multidimensional space in which a point
represents a possible living creature, whose attributes are coordinates on
each of the very large number of axes (e.g. length, mass, number of legs,
etc.) He points out that this space is enormously empty, as most points
represent creatures that are not viable. Moreover, any mutation that
represents a big jump in this multidimensional space takes you to a point in
that space representing a nonviable creature.

Viable creatures are represented by clouds of neighboring points, surrounded
by vast empty spaces. New species (to the extent that "species" is a
meaningful term) to be viable will be near these clouds. If a cloud is
densely occupied, a new species will most likely be found just outside the
cloud, exploiting an until-now "void" but with only small changes from the
attributes of existing creatures in this grouping.

In this metaphor it seems to me that void-filling is "driven"
essentially "entropically" -- to exploit a larger space. The analogy would
be a gas confined in a small portion of a large empty box.
Remove the barriers, and it looks to the observer as though the gas is
"driven" to fill the void. But at a micro level all you see is molecules
running around randomly, sometimes colliding with other molecules or the
walls. According to mechanical laws, the gas could continue to occupy a
small portion of the otherwise empty box, or return to such a configuration
after making excursions. But there are so many more ways of arranging the
molecules to exploit the entire space of the box that there is a crushingly
large probability any time you look in the future of finding the box
completely filled. In the process of this filling, it "looks" to the
observer as though the gas is "driven" by some "force" to occupy the large
space. But that's an illusion. Or you can I suppose define an equivalent
"entropic force"
doing the driving.

Incidentally, when I only recently read The Origin of Species I was struck
by how much ecology there is in the book. At one point Darwin specifically
says that one of the largest influences driving the evolution of species is
the other species in the environment. And the last few pages are a
wonderfully lyrical paean to an ecological view of interacting organisms
(his English river bank).

Bruce Sherwood

Russ Abbott russ.abbott at gmail.com
Thu May 12 00:13:53 EDT 2011
Previous message: [FRIAM] What evolves?
Next message: [FRIAM] What evolves?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Lots to
respond to. First of all, Nick, why do you say I am discarding the
distinction between living and non-living. I don't recall saying that.

To Dave's point:

By "fitness" I mean nothing more than 'void filling'   ...   There is no
"process" anymore than there is a "process" when water in a flooding river
'fills voids' on the other side of the levee.


That still leaves open the question of the scientific explanation for how
voids are filled. Is there a physical force that produces that result? In
the case of water going downhill, the force is gravity. What's the analogous
force (or other explanation) for void filling in evolution?
What's the scientific explanation for how it happens?

*-- Russ Abbott*
*_____________________________________________*
***  Professor, Computer Science*
*  California State University, Los Angeles*

*  Google voice: 747-*999-5105
*  blog: *http://russabbott.blogspot.com/
  vita:  http://sites.google.com/site/russabbott/

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives,
unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to