Owen, 

 

I am still puzzled.  Is this just a hankering, or is there some fundamental
puzzle about the Nature of Things that would be answered by Knowing 100 %
that there was other life out there, rather than just knowing it 99 and
44/100 %? And what is this thing about INTELLLIGENT life?  Isn't all life
intelligent?  Is it that one is hoping to see one's mirror image looking at
the sky one night?  Is this the twin many of us lost in the uterus that we
are trying to find?   I just find it all bemusing.  Like I was Mork or
something.  

 

And there are so many other puzzles, closer to home, that seem worthy of our
attention.  Our lifetimes have been filled with miracles and wonder (Don't
cry, baby, don't cry, don't cry) and yet I have no sense that the average
misery of the human species has diminished one bit.  We live in a country
into which untold luxuries pour from all over the world, and yet nobody
seems particularly grateful.  

 

Perhaps it's because of these intractable problems that life on Alpha Romero
II seems so interesting. 

 

Nick 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 2:18 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] So, *Are* We Alone?

 

Doug: thanks for the additional material.  It exactly encapsulates my
initial thoughts: there are so many possibilities in terms of time, space,
number of galaxies and solar systems, that it just GOTTA be true!

 

But taking Page's Model Thinking class made me wonder, after hearing Hawking
on TED, that I might be able to build a bit more of a model.  So I looked
into star types and their evolution and ages and was quite surprised that
the number of generations of stars is a small number.  Granted they overlap
and possibly a Population II star could support life, .. but if we're
betting on Population 1 stars, we may be seeing widespread life starting
within a billion years or so of each other, not spread out over the 14BY of
our universe.

 

Nick: mainly that star formation and percentage of heavy elements would
greatly change the probabilistic models of "intelligent" life.  I was taken
aback by the thought.  And what INTERESTS me is that one can make scenarios
that are a bit more concrete than my prior thought that there are so many
worlds and time, that intelligent life is inevitable.  My model is becoming
more like within the era of formation of Population 1 stars is a reasonable
boundary condition.  Still a lot, and still intelligent life looks pretty
probable.  But less so than before.

 

In general, I think other intelligent life forms are interesting to think
about.  I bet for example, they are pondering prime numbers as we do.  I bet
they have found that "chance" does not mean "no structure" .. i.e. random
processes can create highly structured results.  Evolution and Us for
example.

 

   -- Owen

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Nicholas Thompson
<[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Owen, 

 

I don't know how to ask this question without sounding churlish.

 

But why is this question INTERESTING?  That's not a rhetorical question,  It
actually doesn't INTEREST me.  The cranky voice inside me wants to say, of
COURSE we are term limited, of course our term of office could end at any
time.  In fact, I think it has probably come quite close to ending a couple
of times during our life time.  If we are around long enough to be picked
off by a comet, I would say we are doing REALLY WELL.   OF COURSE, there is
no MEANING to our existence.  And of COURSE, we are probably not the only
life in the UNIVERSE, although I don't see how knowing that there is some
bit of slime with two heads on Alpha Romero II makes me feel less ALONE.  

 

There seems to be a huge confusion in this sort of discourse.  Aloneness has
to do our inability to muster the courage to engage with one another. (The
courage to start a reading group; the courage to invite others to dinner;
the courage to go to church, if that is one's inclination.)  It does NOT
have to do with whether there is other life in the universe.   And casting
it in this lofty celestial way only gets in the way of our enjoying, being
grateful for, and doing what we can to nurture, what we have.  

 

I have to admit, much as I have been titillated by the space program, I have
always seen it as evidence of wildly misguided priorities.   See, I really
am in need of help, here. 

 

Nick  

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to