Nick says: "what is this thing about INTELLLIGENT life?  Isn’t all life
intelligent? "

Yes. Nick, you are correct, there is a bit of sloppiness going on here, but it
is a common sloppiness and I suspect the term is well understood in context.

When people talk about finding 'intelligent life' on another planet, they are
trying to invoke the notion of some level of linguistic and technological
sophistication. Usually a linguistic sophistication that would allow us to
converse about reasonably sophisticated ideas in a peaceful manner - we want
enlightenment era entreaties between civilizations, not grunts that mediate
between attack mode and ignore mode. Usually technological sophistication is
about tool use, advanced modes of transport, fingers crossed that they can
travel in space at least as well as we can, etc. 

As for your other question, I also do not know why it is interesting... but, to
me at least, it is interesting.

Eric


On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 05:13 PM, "Nicholas  Thompson"
<nickthomp...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>Owen, 


>
>


>
>


>
>
>


>
> 


>
>


>
>
>I am still puzzled.  Is this just a hankering, or is there some fundamental
puzzle about the Nature of Things that would be answered by Knowing 100 % that
there was other life out there, rather than just knowing it 99 and 44/100 %?
And what is this thing about INTELLLIGENT life?  Isn’t all life intelligent? 
Is it that one is hoping to see one’s mirror image looking at the sky one
night?  Is this the twin many of us lost in the uterus that we are trying to
find?   I just find it all bemusing.  Like I was Mork or something.  


>
>


>
>


>
>
>


>
> 


>
>


>
>
>And there are so many other puzzles, closer to home, that seem worthy of our
attention.  Our lifetimes have been filled with miracles and wonder (Don’t
cry, baby, don’t cry, don’t cry) and yet I have no sense that the average
misery of the human species has diminished one bit.  We live in a country into
which untold luxuries pour from all over the world, and yet nobody seems
particularly grateful.  


>
>


>
>


>
>
>


>
> 


>
>


>
>
>Perhaps it’s because of these intractable problems that life on Alpha Romero
II seems so interesting. 


>
>


>
>


>
>
>


>
> 


>
>


>
>
>Nick 


>
>


>
>


>
>
> 


>
>


>
>


>
>
>


>
> 


>
>


>
>
>From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Owen Densmore
>Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 2:18 PM
>To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
>Subject: Re: [FRIAM] So, *Are* We Alone?


>
>


>
>


>
>
>


>
> 


>
>


>
>
>Doug: thanks for the additional material.  It exactly encapsulates my initial
thoughts: there are so many possibilities in terms of time, space, number of
galaxies and solar systems, that it just GOTTA be true!


>
>


>
>


>>
>
>


>
> 


>
>


>>
>
>But taking Page's Model Thinking class made me wonder, after hearing Hawking
on TED, that I might be able to build a bit more of a model.  So I looked into
star types and their evolution and ages and was quite surprised that the number
of generations of stars is a small number.  Granted they overlap and possibly a
Population II star could support life, .. but if we're betting on Population 1
stars, we may be seeing widespread life starting within a billion years or so
of each other, not spread out over the 14BY of our universe.


>
>


>
>


>>
>
>


>
> 


>
>


>>
>
>Nick: mainly that star formation and percentage of heavy elements would
greatly change the probabilistic models of "intelligent" life.  I was taken
aback by the thought.  And what INTERESTS me is that one can make scenarios
that are a bit more concrete than my prior thought that there are so many
worlds and time, that intelligent life is inevitable.  My model is becoming
more like within the era of formation of Population 1 stars is a reasonable
boundary condition.  Still a lot, and still intelligent life looks pretty
probable.  But less so than before.


>
>


>
>


>>
>
>


>
> 


>
>


>>
>
>In general, I think other intelligent life forms are interesting to think
about.  I bet for example, they are pondering prime numbers as we do.  I bet
they have found that "chance" does not mean "no structure" .. i.e. random
processes can create highly structured results.  Evolution and Us for example.


>
>


>
>


>>
>
>


>
> 


>
>


>>
>
>
>   -- Owen


>
>


>
>


>>
>
>
>On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Nicholas Thompson <<#>> wrote:


>
>


>
>


>>
>
>
>Dear Owen, 


>
>


>
>


>
>
> 


>
>


>
>


>
>
>I don’t know how to ask this question without sounding churlish.


>
>


>
>


>
>
> 


>
>


>
>


>
>
>But why is this question INTERESTING?  That’s not a rhetorical question,  It
actually doesn’t INTEREST me.  The cranky voice inside me wants to say, of
COURSE we are term limited, of course our term of office could end at any time.
 In fact, I think it has probably come quite close to ending a couple of times
during our life time.  If we are around long enough to be picked off by a
comet, I would say we are doing REALLY WELL.   OF COURSE, there is no MEANING
to our existence.  And of COURSE, we are probably not the only life in the
UNIVERSE, although I don’t see how knowing that there is some bit of slime
with two heads on Alpha Romero II makes me feel less ALONE.  


>
>


>
>


>
>
> 


>
>


>
>


>
>
>There seems to be a huge confusion in this sort of discourse.  Aloneness has
to do our inability to muster the courage to engage with one another. (The
courage to start a reading group; the courage to invite others to dinner; the
courage to go to church, if that is one’s inclination.)  It does NOT have to
do with whether there is other life in the universe.   And casting it in this
lofty celestial way only gets in the way of our enjoying, being grateful for,
and doing what we can to nurture, what we have.  


>
>


>
>


>
>
> 


>
>


>
>


>
>
>I have to admit, much as I have been titillated by the space program, I have
always seen it as evidence of wildly misguided priorities.   See, I really am
in need of help, here. 


>
>


>
>


>
>
> 


>
>


>
>


>
>
>Nick  


>
>


>
>


>
>
>
>
============================================================
>FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>

Eric Charles

Professional Student and
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Penn State University
Altoona, PA 16601


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to