It's a shame I stopped reading when I did on the wikipedia academic elitism
link when I got to the nugget I was looking for, because *this* nugget is a
real gem:

"Some observers argue that, while academicians often perceive themselves as
members of an elite, their influence is mostly imaginary: "Professors of
humanities, with all their leftist fantasies, have little direct knowledge
of American life and no impact whatever on public
policy."[3]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_elitism#cite_note-2>

Academic elitism suggests that in highly competitive academic environments
only those individuals who have engaged in
scholarship<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_method> are
deemed to have anything worthwhile to say, or do. It suggests that
individuals who have not engaged in such scholarship are
cranks<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crank_(person)>.
Steven Zhang of the Cornell Daily
Sun<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornell_Daily_Sun> has
described the graduates of elite schools, especially those in the Ivy
League<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_League>,
of having a "smug sense of success" because they believe "gaining entrance
into the Ivy League is an accomplishment unto itself."[*citation
needed<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed>
*]"

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Douglas Roberts <[email protected]>wrote:

> I, OTOH, was fairly certain I was going to encounter approximately the
> same amount as usual of, what do we call it?  Pollyanna-like behavior:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollyanna_principle
>
> No, that's not quite right.
>
> Academic ivory tower elitism?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_elitism
>
> Well no, that doesn't quite capture all of it either.  Although this one
> sentence comes fairly close to capturing the dietary element that abounds
> here on FRIAM:  *Another criticism is that universities [substitute
> academics here for the purpose of my point] tend more to
> pseudo-intellectualism than intellectualism per se; for example, to protect
> their positions and prestige, academicians may over-complicate problems and
> express them in obscure language.*
> *
> *
> The Osterich Effect, but as applied to societal problems rather than
> economic ones:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostrich_effect
>
> Some combination of the above, perhaps.
>
> --Doug
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:53 AM, glen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Douglas Roberts wrote at 09/26/2012 09:03 PM:
>> > dead gang members are far more productive members of society than
>> > live ones, I suspect.
>>
>> And here I was worried I wouldn't get enough _hate_ in my diet today.
>>
>> --
>> glen
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Doug Roberts
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
> http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins
> <http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins>
> 505-455-7333 - Office
> 505-670-8195 - Cell
>
>


-- 
Doug Roberts
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins
<http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins>
505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to